首例指控诺贝尔奖组织诽谤和不正当竞争的官司

2012年-12月-06日来源：加州洛杉矶报道

1、起诉声明 ：Complaint.pdf

2、法院传票 ：Summons.pdf

FIRST SUIT AGAINST NOBEL PRIZE ORGANIZATION

CITING DEFAMATION AND UNFAIR COMPETITION PRACTICES IS FILED

首例指控诺贝尔奖组织诽谤和不正当竞争的官司

Los Angeles, CA, December 4, 2012 — Dr. Rongxiang Xu, the founder of “human body regenerative restoration science” and a renowned life scientist and medical scientist, has filed a lawsuit today against The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet, a Swedish corporation, aka, Nobelforsamlingen. The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet is a body which awards the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The suit filed in Superior Court of the State of California, Orange County Central Justice Center cites Libel and unfair competition.

2012年12月4日，加州洛杉矶 --人体再生复原科学创立人，知名的生命科学家和医学家徐荣祥博士于今日提交官司起诉瑞典卡罗林斯卡学院诺贝尔委员会，后者负责评选和颁发诺贝尔生理学或医学奖。官司提交到加州高等法院，橙县中心法庭，指控诽谤和不正当竞争。

Dr. Xu, one of the leading scientists in the world, discovered “regenerative cell” in 1984 during his study of burn treatments that has benefited 20 million burn victims in 73 countries, claims his good reputation in the community was defamed by a statement published by defendants, The Nobel Assembly causing damages to Dr. Xu by their conduct. The suit alleges the Nobel Assembly has been successful in garnering media attention for their Nobel Prize announcements in essentially every major news organizations and publications world-wide, proving they can affect the perception of an individual by misreporting information.

徐博士是世界顶尖科学家之一，于1984年在其治疗烧伤的研究中发现了“再生细胞”，其烧伤疗法已在73个国家造福了2000万烧伤患者。徐博士指控被告诺贝尔委员会公布的声明对其造成了伤害，诋毁了其在业内的良好声誉。官司指控诺贝尔委员会成功吸引了世界上几乎所有主流新闻机构和出版物关注其颁奖公告，证明他们的错误报道会影响大众的看法。

“My main priority for filing this suit was to clarify the Academy’s mistaken and misleading statements for the preservation of humanity and future generations, life science research should not desecrate the nature of human life.” stated Dr. Xu.

徐博士声称，“我提告的主要出发点是为保护人类及其未来世代而澄清被告误导性的错误声明，生命科学研究不能亵渎人类生命的属性。”

On October 8, 2012, The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2012 was awarded jointly to Sir John B. Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka “for the discovery that mature cells can be reprogrammed to become pluripotent,” which was covered extensively in the media.

2012年10月8号，诺贝尔生理学或医学奖授予了约翰·戈登和山中伸弥先生，表彰他们“发现成熟细胞能够被重编程而呈现多能性”，媒体对此进行了广泛报道。

Furthermore, in an abstract published on its website made in conjunction with the selection, the Nobel Assembly described the scientists’ discovery. In the description, the Nobel Assembly claims that the scientists’ discovery “represents a paradigm shift in our understanding of cellular differentiation and of the plasticity of the differentiated state.” The abstract goes on to claim that: “[t]ogether, Gurdon and Yamanaka have transformed our understanding of cellular differentiation. They have demonstrated that the usually very stable differentiated state can be unlocked because it harbours a potential for reversion to pluripotency. This discovery has introduced fundamentally new research areas, and offers exciting new opportunities to study disease mechanisms.”

此外，在其网页上发表的与评奖相连的摘要里，诺贝尔委员会声称获奖科学家的发现“代表我们对细胞分化和分化后状态可塑性的理解发生了模式转变”，接着又说“戈登和山中共同改变了我们对细胞分化的理解。他们证明了细胞分化后通常很稳定的状态能够被解锁因为它藏有逆转回多能性的潜力。这一发现开启了全新的研究领域，并为研究疾病机理提供了令人兴奋的新机会。”

Dr. Xu believes, and alleges the Statement made by the Nobel Assembly is false as he was the scientist who made the discovery a decade earlier, therefore defaming his exemplary reputation. The Nobel Assembly states that the scientists who won the Nobel Prize “have transformed our understanding of cellular differentiation” because “[t]hey have demonstrated that the usually very stable differentiated state can be unlocked because it harbours a potential for reversion to pluripotency.” Those scientists did not demonstrate as such. It was ten years earlier that Dr. Xu made that discovery when he was able to explain how his discovery unlocked a somatic cell’s potential to revert to pluripotent stem cell in situ.

徐博士相信并指控诺贝尔委员会的声明是错误的，中伤了他作为典范的声誉，因为声明里的发现是他在十年前做出的。诺贝尔委员会声称获奖科学家的发现 “改变了我们对细胞分化的理解”，因为“他们证明了细胞分化后通常很稳定的状态能够被解锁因为它藏有逆转回多能性的潜力。”那些科学家没有证明这一点，这是徐博士在十年前能够解释出他发现的解锁体细胞潜能使其原位逆转回多能干细胞时发现的。

The Nobel Assembly’s use of the word “unlocked” compounds the falsity of the statement because it suggests that the scientists who won the Nobel Prize are harnessing an inherent ability of a somatic cell to revert to its pluripotent state through natural means that do not alter the cells integrity. If the Nobel Prize scientists’ findings consisted of leaving a somatic cell intact and unmodified, such as Dr. Xu’s finding, then the Statement would have been true and accurate. However, the Nobel Prize scientists’ discovery actually consists of the creation of an altered cell having nothing to do with human body pluripotent stem cell. The Academy also falsely stated that “[t]his discovery has introduced fundamentally new research areas, and offers exciting new opportunities to study disease mechanisms” which is also inaccurate.

诺贝尔委员会使用“解锁”这个字眼构成了不实声明，因为它意味着获奖的科学家是利用体细胞固有的能力通过不改变细胞完整性的自然的方式逆转回多能性状态。如果获奖科学家的发现能够像徐博士所做的那样，保持体细胞的完整性不对其进行人工改造，那么这个声明才会是真实的、准确的。但是，这些获奖科学家的发现实际上是制造了一个与多能干细胞毫无关系的改造细胞。颁奖机构还错误的声称“这一发现开启了全新的研究领域，并为研究疾病机理提供了令人兴奋的新机会”，这也是不对的。

Lastly, The Statements made by the defendant has falsely tainted and damaged Dr. Xu’s achievements in the eyes of the scientific community, business, potential investors and his ability to continue to be selected as a top keynote speaker for several major international conferences.

最后，被告的错误声明玷污和损害了在科学界商界以及潜在投资人心目中徐博士的成就及其继续被选为主流国际会议主讲人的机会。